To Whom It May Concern,
My name is Brad Kohler. I am running for Governor of Minnesota as an independent conservative in 2026. Before I ask a single voter for their support, I am asking your organization for something different: your expertise, your standards, and your voice at the table where the decisions will be made.
I am sending this letter to every major environmental, conservation, supply chain ethics, and labor organization with a documented interest in Minnesota's mineral and energy future — regardless of your current position on development. That includes organizations that have actively opposed the Duluth Complex. That includes organizations that have sued to stop the permits. The invitation is unconditional.
Agenda Minnesota is the most comprehensively sourced governing document ever put before a Minnesota voter. It discloses its own environmental risks explicitly. It acknowledges that Duluth Complex development carries real consequences for the St. Louis River watershed, for wetland ecosystems, and for the Lake Superior basin. I am not running from those risks. I am asking your organization to help me manage them responsibly.
Here is the honest frame: the minerals under northeastern Minnesota are being extracted somewhere. American electric vehicles, defense systems, and consumer electronics run on cobalt, nickel, and platinum group metals. Right now, 70 percent of the world's cobalt comes from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where child labor has been documented in artisanal supply chains by Amnesty International and the USGS. Minnesota holds 88 percent of confirmed U.S. cobalt reserves and produces zero.
I am not presenting that as a reason to abandon environmental standards. I am presenting it as the reason those standards must be applied to the full supply chain — not only the Minnesota end of it. The question is not whether these minerals are mined. The question is where, and under whose rules.
For generations, candidates and organizations like yours have played an adversarial role in this process. You pushed back. They ignored you, or they were bought by the interests that wanted you ignored. The result is sixty years without a developed Duluth Complex industry — the ground still locked, the communities still emptying, and the minerals still sourced from places with no comparable environmental standard.
I am asking you to try something different. Not because I am asking you to trust me blindly. Because I am offering you something no Minnesota candidate has ever offered before: a formal role in building the environmental framework before any permit is signed, with your standards documented publicly and your concerns answered on the record.
I understand that some of you will come to this table expecting to oppose the plan. I welcome that. I understand that some of you have concerns that cannot be resolved to your satisfaction. I want to hear those too. I would rather know exactly where the lines are before the ground breaks than discover them in a courtroom afterward.
Whether you believe in Agenda Minnesota's vision or not — whether you support my candidacy or not — bring your voice, your input, and your reasoning to the table in good faith. I will take it seriously. I will document it publicly. I will respond to it on the record. And I will build whatever comes from that conversation into the governing plan.
| Organization | Priority | Sent ✓ | Received ✓ | Date Sent | Status | What We Changed | Response / Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier One — Supply Chain & Responsible Sourcing Organizations | |||||||
Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) Focused on responsible cobalt/nickel sourcing from conflict zones. Their mission overlaps significantly with the supply-chain concerns raised in Agenda Minnesota. Tier 1 · Natural Ally |
HIGH | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
Enough Project Documents conflict minerals and child labor in DRC cobalt supply chains. Their research provides relevant context regarding global mineral sourcing and the conditions in current supply chains. Tier 1 · Natural Ally |
HIGH | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
Global Witness International organization documenting environmental abuses in resource extraction. Their DRC cobalt reporting provides relevant research regarding global mineral supply chains. Tier 1 · Natural Ally |
HIGH | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) Sets and certifies mining standards globally. Inviting them to apply their standard to our framework turns opposition into co-authorship. Tier 1 · Standards Body |
HIGH | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
| Tier Two — Bipartisan Conservation Groups with Iron Range Members | |||||||
Izaak Walton League of America — MN Division Oldest U.S. conservation org. Bipartisan. Heavy Iron Range membership. Water quality focus — specific addressable concerns. Tier 2 · Persuadable |
HIGH | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
Ducks Unlimited — Minnesota Wetland conservation. Republican-leaning Iron Range hunters. Not opposed to resource development in principle — focused on specific wetland impacts we can address. Tier 2 · Persuadable |
HIGH | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
Minnesota Trout Unlimited Cold-water fisheries in NE Minnesota. Water quality concerns are legitimate and specific. A written commitment on St. Louis River protections could bring them to neutral. Tier 2 · Persuadable |
MEDIUM | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
Minnesota Deer Hunters Association Large bipartisan NE Minnesota membership. No inherent mining opposition. Habitat access and land use are addressable concerns. Tier 2 · Persuadable |
MEDIUM | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
Pheasants Forever — Minnesota Conservation agriculture. Bipartisan. Rural MN credibility. Not Iron Range specific but reaches the Kohler base. Tier 2 · Persuadable |
MEDIUM | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
| Tier Three — Credibility Validators | |||||||
UMN Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI) Wrote the 2007 baseline estimate Agenda Minnesota builds on. Most credible academic voice on Duluth Complex data. An academic partnership is enormously valuable. Tier 3 · Credibility |
HIGH | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
The Nature Conservancy — Minnesota Has precedent working with mining companies on conservation easements. Not categorically opposed. A dialogue signals legitimacy even without endorsement. Tier 3 · Credibility |
MEDIUM | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
Sierra Club — North Star Chapter (MN) Has opposed Twin Metals specifically. Most difficult. Most valuable if achieved. The unconditional invitation itself is the statement — publish their refusal if they refuse. Tier 3 · Hardest / Most Valuable |
REACH | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
Minnesota Environmental Partnership Coalition of 80+ MN environmental orgs. Reaching MEP reaches everyone at once. A published written exchange is itself a win regardless of outcome. Tier 3 · Coalition |
REACH | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
World Wildlife Fund — Supply Chain Program Corporate supply chain ethics programs. Tracks conflict minerals specifically. DRC cobalt frame is directly in their portfolio. Tier 3 · International |
REACH | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
| Tier Four — Labor & Supply Chain Partners | |||||||
United Steelworkers — Minnesota Represents current Iron Range taconite workers. Has both labor AND environmental standards interests. Natural coalition partner on both fronts. Tier 4 · Labor |
HIGH | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
Iron Mining Association of Minnesota Industry group with existing environmental compliance framework. Partnership signals Kohler development is coordinated, not rogue. Tier 4 · Industry |
HIGH | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||
Amnesty International USA — Business & Human Rights Published the definitive DRC child labor cobalt report. Their research documents conditions in current global supply chains and provides important context for this discussion. Tier 4 · Human Rights |
MEDIUM | ✓ |
✓ |
— not sent — | Awaiting response | ||